Concerns are growing within the Israeli administration regarding the draft agreement being formed between the US and Iran. Israeli assessments suggest that the draft does not meet Tel Aviv's security demands and could provide new gains to Iran.
It is reported that the Israeli cabinet has convened to discuss the implications of the upcoming agreement. Media reports indicate that political and military circles have had limited influence during the negotiation process.
Missile Program and Regional Ties Raise Concerns
According to Israeli officials, the draft does not include direct obligations concerning Iran's ballistic missile program and its relationships with regional allies. These issues are among Israel's most significant security concerns.
Officials express the view that the agreement could strengthen reconnection and supply channels between Iran and regional actors. This situation is seen as potentially weakening the military and political gains Israel claims to have achieved recently.
Nuclear File and Timeline Debate
On the nuclear issue, Israel perceives the framework as falling short of its expectations. Israeli assessments suggest that Washington may accept formulas limited to reducing uranium enrichment levels, while the removal of enriched stockpiles from Iran might not be on the agenda.
The proposed sixty-day period to complete negotiations is also a source of concern. Opinions are shared that this timeframe could allow Iran to stall and buy time.
Within Israel, there is also worry that as the process advances, the US could lose its leverage over Iran. It is considered that even if Tehran fails to fulfill new obligations after the deadline, Washington's pressure capabilities might weaken.
Regional Balance and Lapid's Criticism
The agreement is argued to have consequences not only for security but also for the economy and regional balance. Israeli officials suggest that the compromise could increase stability in the Strait of Hormuz and provide relief to Iran's economy.
This scenario leads to interpretations that Tehran could strengthen its regional position and challenge the pressure policy advocated by Israel. Israeli media evaluations emphasize that Tel Aviv has been excluded from the process and has limited influence on decision-making mechanisms.
Opposition leader Yair Lapid also argues that the draft agreement fails to achieve any of Israel's declared goals. According to Lapid, the Iranian regime will continue to exist, the missile program will persist, and the future reestablishment of nuclear capacity will not be prevented.
