French magazine Onze Mondial published a report highlighting a series of controversial refereeing decisions that marked Argentina's journey in the 2026 World Cup. The report alleged that decisions in matches against Muslim and Arab teams, in particular, favored Argentina.
Unpunished Messi challenge against Algeria
According to the report, in the group stage match where Argentina beat Algeria 3-0, Lionel Messi's harsh tackle on Algerian defender Aissa Mandi went unpunished. After the referee and VAR room ignored the incident, the Algerian players' protests were to no avail. Messi remained on the pitch and carried on contributing to the victory.
Egypt's goal disallowed by VAR
The round of 16 match against Egypt, which Argentina won 3-2, sparked the biggest controversy. Egypt's chance to go 2-0 up was wiped out by a goal disallowed after a VAR review for a foul by Lisandro Martinez. It was notable that Egyptian players received 5 yellow cards throughout the match, while no Argentine player was booked. Egypt coach Hossam Hassan said the referees were "under great pressure" and that this favored Argentina.
Errors in the Cape Verde match
In the round of 32 match where Argentina beat Cape Verde 3-2, a series of errors also occurred. It was noted that a foul on Varela was ignored, and no penalty was given despite Cristian Medina handling the ball in the box. Also criticized were Messi's free kick taken before the wall was set, and Nicolas Tagliafico being allowed to return to play without a delay, despite having a bleeding wound, contrary to the rules.
Switzerland match and 'two kinds of refereeing' comment
In the quarterfinal match against Switzerland, another controversial decision was made. In the 72nd minute, Swiss forward Breel Embolo was sent off for a second yellow card for simulation. However, it was stated that the yellow card was initially shown to Argentine Leandro Paredes. While Switzerland were down to 10 men, they lost the match in extra time. Switzerland coach Murat Yakin said after the match, "There were two kinds of refereeing."
Onze Mondial magazine wrote that these successive controversial decisions fueled conspiracy theories about Argentina's progress in the tournament.
